40‑Year QA Expert & Boeing Shareholder Daryl Guberman Warns India & China: 777X Built to Obsolete Standards After 24 Years of Oversight Collapse

WASHINGTON - Rezul -- FOR IMMEDIATE GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION:  FEATURE ARTICLE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR INDIA & CHINA — READ BEFORE PROCEEDING

STATEMENT 1 — What the Press Release Contains

This press release exposes that Boeing built the 777X — and thousands of aircraft components — during a 24‑year collapse in AS9100 oversight. Boeing abandoned AS9100 in 2002, stopped on‑site supplier audits, and relied only on FAA/EASA end‑stage airworthiness certificates instead of accredited, verified quality‑system controls.

If India and China do not listen: you will be accepting aircraft built under obsolete, unverified, and undocumented conditions, with no independent proof that critical parts were manufactured correctly.

STATEMENT 2 — The 777X Crisis and Its Consequences

The press release details that the first 30 Boeing 777X aircraft were built between 2018 and 2024 — entirely inside Boeing's quality‑system collapse. These aircraft now require years of structural rework: door‑surround reinforcements, wingbox corrections, fuselage margin updates, software revisions, and GE9X engine durability fixes.

If India and China do not listen: you risk receiving aircraft that may require grounding, retrofitting, or structural intervention after delivery, causing operational disruption, financial loss, and potential safety exposure.

STATEMENT 3 — The Air India AI‑101 Toggle‑Switch Disaster

The press release explains how Air India Flight AI‑101 nearly suffered a catastrophic event when a vibratory‑sensitive engine‑run toggle switch slipped toward OFF during takeoff — a hazard documented in FAA Alert NM-18-33. The aircraft was built in 2015, inside Boeing's unaccredited period, meaning the switch's integrity cannot be independently verified under AS9100.

If India and China do not listen: similar unverified components may already exist in your fleets, creating the possibility of thrust‑loss events, engine rollback, or emergency landings that depend on pilot skill and luck rather than certified system reliability.

STATEMENT 4 — The Oversight Breakdown and Its Global Impact

The press release reveals that Boeing's abandonment of supplier audits after 2002 weakened oversight of heat treatment, welding, nondestructive testing, and other critical processes. Boeing also sat on the ANSI‑ANAB accreditation committee while relying on the same accreditation structure — a conflict that undermines independence. Even Boeing's supplier portal displayed obsolete accreditation designations for a decade, raising questions about documentation accuracy.

If India and China do not listen: you will be relying on documentation that may be outdated, inaccurate, or unverifiable, making it impossible to prove compliance in an investigation or accident inquiry.

STATEMENT 5 — The Leadership Contradiction and What It Means for You

The press release shows that Boeing's public claims — that they were "willing and prepared" to obtain AS9100 certification, "compliant with the standard," and "conducting internal audits as if certified" — did not match what was found on the factory floor. Employees were unfamiliar with AS9100, unaware of internal audits, and unable to confirm the processes Boeing claimed to follow.

If India and China do not listen: you risk accepting assurances that are not supported by internal practice, leaving you exposed to hidden defects, undocumented processes, and systemic quality gaps.

STATEMENT 6 — The Expert at the Table: Why India and China Must Listen Now

The press release concludes by stating that a 40‑year quality‑systems expert, composites specialist, non‑ferrous metals expert, aluminum and titanium alloys specialist, forensic accreditation investigator, and Boeing shareholder — Daryl Guberman — is offering his expertise directly at the table with Boeing, India, and China.

He stood at the DHS Subcommittee on April 17, 2024 https://www.newstribune.com/photos/2024/apr/18/3749044/ , exposing that Boeing abandoned on‑site supplier auditing for 24 years. He returned on June 18, 2024, where a grieving mother screamed at Boeing's CEO, "You killed my daughter, you killed my family." He confronted the contradictions in Elizabeth Lund's Reuters interview, where she claimed Boeing was compliant with AS9100 and performing internal audits — claims disproven by his boots‑on‑the‑ground investigation in October 2024 at Everett, Renton, Auburn, and Northfield.

More on Rezul News

• Early Bird Registration Open for FLYING HY, the Top Hydrogen and Battery Electric Aviation Event
• Century Fasteners Corp. Hires Tony Marano as Director of Human Resources
• ICI Homes in Mariposa at EverRange opens new model home
• Accelerating Toward Commercialization as FDA Momentum, AI Neurotherapy & Manufacturing Expansion Drive Multi-Catalyst Growth Story; N A S D A Q: NRXP
• New Wisconsin Report Shows Most Plane Crashes Happen Outside Major Hubs

No Media did this.

No legal team did this.

No Senate subcommittee did this.

Only Daryl Guberman did.

If India and China do not listen: you will be negotiating with Boeing without the only individual who has exposed the 24‑year oversight collapse, confronted Boeing leadership, investigated the factories personally, and holds a shareholder's vested interest in ensuring the truth is documented. Without this expertise at the table, India cannot finalize a credible report after June, and China risks proceeding with a 200‑aircraft acquisition without independent verification.

PRESS RELEASE:

Daryl Guberman, a 40‑year quality‑systems expert, forensic accreditation investigator, and Boeing shareholder, has issued a direct and uncompromising warning to the aviation authorities of India, China, Germany, and South America regarding Boeing's 777X program and the systemic certification failures now threatening global aviation safety.

Guberman states:

"Do not listen to Boeing. Do not listen to the FAA.

Do not accept their assurances.

We have the receipts."

THE 777X CRISIS: 30 AIRCRAFT BUILT TO OBSOLETE STANDARDS — AND BUILT DURING THE 2002–PRESENT QUALITY COLLAPSE

The early‑production Boeing 777X aircraft — the ones now requiring massive structural rework — were built between 2018 and 2024, a period that falls squarely inside Boeing's 2002–present quality‑system collapse, when:

• Boeing abandoned AS9100 certification
• Boeing eliminated on‑site supplier audits
• Boeing relied solely on FAA/EASA end‑stage airworthiness
• Suppliers operated without AS9100‑aligned verification

This means:

Every one of the ~30 early‑build 777X aircraft was built under the same compromised, unaccredited, and unverified supply‑chain conditions that have plagued Boeing since 2002.

These aircraft now require years of structural rework, including:

• Door‑surround structural reinforcement
• Wing and wingbox load‑path corrections
• Fuselage frame and skin margin updates
• Flight‑control software revisions
• GE9X engine durability corrections

Guberman emphasizes:

"These jets were built to a standard that no longer exists.

They are obsolete the moment they leave the factory."

THE TOGGLE‑SWITCH DISASTER: AIR INDIA 787 — BUILT DURING THE ACCREDITATION BREAKDOWN

THE AIRCRAFT:

Boeing 787‑8 Dreamliner — Registration VT‑ANE

Build Year: 2015

(Inside the 2002–present Boeing quality collapse)

(Delivered after the 2018 accreditation‑integrity concerns began)

Guberman argues that because this aircraft was built during a period of weakened supplier oversight, the integrity of the engine‑run toggle switch — and other components — cannot be independently verified under AS9100 standards.

THE INCIDENT: AIR INDIA FLIGHT AI‑101

Route: Delhi → New York

Location of Emergency: Newark airspace

Fatalities: 0 — only because of extraordinary crew skill and sheer luck

During takeoff, the engine‑run toggle switch — the same switch referenced in FAA Alert NM-18-33 / December 17, 2018 — experienced vibratory‑induced displacement, a known hazard documented by the FAA.

FAA Alert NM-18-33 warns that the toggle switch:

• Can slip into the OFF position
• Is vulnerable to vibratory stresses during takeoff and landing
• Can cause loss of thrust control
• Can trigger engine rollback or shutdown conditions
• Must be inspected and secured due to catastrophic‑risk potential

Guberman states:

"India — this is your wake‑up call.

The toggle switch was not just a defect — it was the product of a broken oversight chain."

THE OVERSIGHT BREAKDOWN: SUPPLIER AUDITS, CRITICAL PROCESSES, AND ACCREDITATION INTEGRITY

Guberman asserts that Boeing's quality‑system deterioration extends far beyond the 777X program. According to his analysis, Boeing's decision to abandon on‑site supplier auditing after 2002 created long‑term vulnerabilities across critical manufacturing processes, including heat treatment, welding, nondestructive testing (NDT), and AS9100‑linked quality management activities. (As of January 2026 AS9100 became AI9100) 777X surgery: Boeing faces costly rework on roughly 30 stored jets https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/777x-surgery-boeing-faces-costly-rework-on-roughly-30-stored-jets/ar-AA21JoPw

He notes that Boeing's supplier guidance historically stated that suppliers should "send your certification, send your parts, and if need be or the need arises, Boeing will come visit them." In his view, this shift away from direct verification fundamentally weakened the integrity of the supply chain.

More on Rezul News

• Book Florida Keys Accommodations Early with KeysCaribbean and Save 15 Percent
• Color Card Administrator Highlights Growing Enterprise Demand for Workflow Orchestration in Enterprise Business Card Governance
• Tennessee Laws Lead with Psychotropic Drug Testing in Mass Shooting Cases and Comprehensive Reporting: CCHR Urges Nationwide Adoption
• Lee Wetherington Homes selected to be in prestigious new home community in Wellen Park
• Curious About Mensa? DFW Event Offers a 1-Day Immersion

Between 2014 and 2024, Boeing held a seat on the ANSI‑ANAB Management Systems Accreditation Committee (MSAC) — the body responsible for, granting, suspending, and withdrawing management‑system accreditation's. Guberman argues that Boeing's presence on this committee, while simultaneously relying on the same accreditation structure for supplier oversight, raises questions about independence and objectivity. He also notes that Boeing wasn't AS9100 certified and asks how did ANSI-ANAB allow membership? This issue is comparable to Guberman's  FAA-2026-3879-0003 submission/Tracking Number mos-wj11-k66h /https://www.regulations.gov/comment/FAA-2026-3879-0003

He further states that after 2018, when accreditation practices came under scrutiny (Reference: U.S. Department of State Contract 19AQMM18R0131), Boeing continued to reference ANAB on its supplier portal. According to Guberman, Boeing's portal still displays the older "ANSI‑ASQ National Accreditation Board" designation even though it became obsolete in 2014, when the organization transitioned to "ANSI‑ANAB." He argues that if Boeing has not updated a basic accreditation reference in more than a decade, it raises broader questions about documentation accuracy and reliability.

THE ELIZABETH LUND CONTRADICTION: PUBLIC CLAIMS VS. OPERATIONAL REALITY

In a June 2024 Reuters interview, Elizabeth Lund — then Boeing's Vice President of Quality — stated that Boeing was:

• "willing and prepared" to obtain AS9100 certification,
• "compliant with the standard," and
• "conducting internal audits as if already certified."

As a Boeing shareholder and 40‑year quality‑systems professional, Guberman took these statements seriously. In October 2024, he traveled to Everett, Renton, Auburn, and Northfield Washington State, to evaluate whether Boeing's internal practices aligned with Lund's claims.

According to Guberman, what he found did not match the public narrative. He reports that:

• Employees he interviewed were unfamiliar with AS9100,
• Personnel were unaware of any internal audits tied to AS9100
• Employees further stated if asked to attend any meeting their supervisors would say " they could not go since the plane needed to move to the next station"
• Employees also said " Job history on aircraft in archives have critical paperwork missing"
• There was no evidence of the structured, documented internal audit program Lund described.

Based on his professional experience, Guberman argues that if Boeing had been performing the type of internal audits Lund referenced, the issues affecting the 30 early‑build 777X aircraft — including documentation gaps and process‑control discrepancies — would have been identified long before the aircraft reached advanced stages of assembly.

GUBERMAN'S FORMAL REQUEST TO INDIA AND CHINA

Guberman concludes with a direct appeal to international regulators, stating that both India and China deserve full transparency and independent representation when engaging with Boeing. He emphasizes that his position is grounded in his 40+ years of quality‑systems experience and his standing as a Boeing shareholder.

He states:

"India — hold your ground. Bring me with you to Seattle.

I am a Boeing shareholder. I have a vested interest.

I have 40 years in quality.

Do not let Boeing bully you."

He continues:

"China — pause your 200‑aircraft acquisition.

You deserve independent verification before proceeding."

Guberman reiterates that on April 17, 2024, he stood before a DHS subcommittee with two documents-bulletins (April & July 2002) under threat of getting ejected or arrested. He said the documents-bulletins were once available on Boeing's supplier portal but later removed. These documents, in his view, showed that Boeing had long shifted away from on‑site supplier auditing for critical processes such as heat treatment, welding, nondestructive testing (NDT), and AS9100‑linked quality controls.

He concludes:

"If Boeing cannot perform a supplier portal update a simple accreditation designation, how can India or China rely on the integrity of the documentation behind their aircraft?

I am formally requesting to represent you at the table with Boeing."

FINAL WORD FROM DARYL GUBERMAN

"I spent twenty‑five years out of the 40 years in manufacturing and quality, uncovering what the world flew on, implanted, trusted, and never questioned: certifications issued by a body that died long before the contracts were signed. There is no waiver, no exception, and no administrative workaround when the foundation itself is fraudulent."   This is the largest industrial and fiduciary fraud effecting all INDUSTRIES WORLDWIDE that require ISO-AS-AI certifications under ANAB & their MRA-MLA  equivalents.

"I am a proud American. I was raised with the fabric that no matter what religion, color, nationality, or politics — we must protect not just America, but all people everywhere."

"Those who forge strength from deception, will one day be crushed by the weight of their own neglect."

— Daryl Guberman, 2026