Tobacco Lawsuit Victor Analyzes $1.4 Trillion Meta Trial

WASHINGTON - Rezul -- With so many comparing the $1.4 trillion lawsuit against Meta to the very successful litigation against the major tobacco companies, the analysis of the Meta trial by "The Law Professor Who Masterminded Litigation Against the Tobacco Industry," who has also been called "a Driving Force Behind the Lawsuits That Have Cost Tobacco Companies Billions of Dollars," could help clear up some of the confusion.

Public interest law professor John Banzhaf, who played a major role not only in suing cigarette manufactures, but also in the formal determination that nicotine was addictive and caused addiction in many if not most of its users, says that the states have a strong case against Facebook and Instagram even if it can't be established that the social media platforms can be addictive like nicotine. . . .

Indeed, that exactly what the law professor predicted months ago: Lawsuits May Force Meta to Redesign Instagram an Expert Says (Banzhaf - "There's almost certainly going to be a vast avalanche of lawsuits. In the tobacco cases, you only had a limited number of potential plaintiffs").

More on Rezul News

• BlazeHive's AI SEO Agent Outranks Human Writers on 500+ Google Top-3 Results in 5 Months, on Autopilot
• ConnectNeighbors.com changes model - Realtors are now free of charge
• Priority Property Group Becomes Preferred Property Management Partner for Charlotte Investors
• On the Boards: Proform Builds Announce New Construction in Alki, Seattle
• On the Boards: Proform Builds Announce New Construction in Gig Harbor

The current Meta lawsuit, as well as the thousands of social media addiction lawsuits which have already been filed, are being compared to the highly successful litigation against cigarette makers who likewise denied that their product was addictive, and thought that the Surgeon General's warning - like Section 230 in the social media trials - protected them from liability.

But Banzhaf points out that plaintiffs in the tobacco cases used clever pleading and tactics to overcome the cigarette companies presumed legal immunity, and it looks like they are doing the same with regard to social media companies and their Section 230 arguments.. .

However, Prof Banzhaf notes out that the concept of addiction is complicated, and that there are important differences between addiction to nicotine in cigarettes and addiction involving social media. . .

ADDICTION TO A SUBSTANCE
. . .

ADDICTION TO SOCIAL MEDIA?
. . .

BUT EVEN IF SOCIAL MEDIA IS NOT ADDICTIVE

More on Rezul News

• Phinge Exposes Massive AI Security Risks, Claiming Its Patented Hardware-Verified Architecture Is The Only Safeguard Against Surveillance Capitalism
• Phinge & CEO Robert DeMaio Publicly Declare Cash Settlements or Judgments Alone Cannot & Will Not Remedy the Deep Public Harm of Infringing Its IP
• Dana Flanagan Expands the Authority Architect, Bringing a Nontraditional Approach to Executive Authority, Strategic Access and Business Growth
• Phinge's Netverse: Reclaiming the Digital Frontier For Everyone Through CEO Robert DeMaio's Vision of a True App-less, User Data Sovereign World
• DuraFast Label Company Launches Seiko SLP850 2" Thermal Printer with Free Label Promotion

. . .

CAUSATION
. . .

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the law professor cautions that jurors may not be particularly interested nor understand the complexities of defining and proving a true addiction.

Instead, as was the case with the tobacco companies which forced them to disgorge almost one-quarter of a TRILLION dollars, they will see rich and powerful companies which were well aware of the harm they were causing to children by a product which causes powerful addictive effects about which they even joked.

http://banzhaf.net/   jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com   @profbanzhaf