Popular on Rezul


Similar on Rezul

Administration Baldly Blundered Garcia's Deportation

Rezul News/10712542
How Trump Administration Should Have Finalized It Many Months Earlier

WASHINGTON - Rezul -- The administration badly blundered in its handling of the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia in many ways.  To cite just a few examples:
■ First, by making - as they admit - a serious mistake in initially deporting him to El Salvador despite a rare withholding of removal order prohibiting it
■ Second, by putting up what looks to many like a sham criminal proceeding  [human smuggling charges] based upon a long ago traffic stop which didn't even result in an arrest
■ Third, by - despite the public promise that he would "never go free on American soil," - returning him to the U.S. as a man free to go home and to garner additional public sympathy
■ Fourth, by apparently having to let an independent federal judge - Obama appointee Paula Xinis - now decide if indeed Garcia can even be deported and, if so, to where

But ICE could have completely legally and very easily deported Garcia to virtually any country other than El Salvador as soon as the original mistake was made, and thereby avoided all of the massive adverse publicity its machinations have caused so far, and will probably continue to cause in the future, says public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

More on Rezul News
Banzhaf explained how this could - and probably should - have been done more than four months ago.
Returning Illegal Migrant From El Salvador 'An Exercise In Futility': Legal Scholars (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/returning-illegal-migrant-from-el-salvador-an-exercise-in-futility-legal-scholars/ar-AA1CY0Hz): "Returning an illegal immigrant and alleged past MS-13 member seized in Baltimore last month and sent to a Salvadoran prison is likely a wasted effort since the administration could easily change his immigration status and deport him again [without ever returning him to American soil], according to legal experts.  'Any such return might be nothing more than an exercise in futility,' George Washington University Law School professor John Banzhaf said.

Here's how he outlined and explained what the administration should have done months ago, with emphasis added.
About a month after professor Banzhaf explained this option, a federal judge agreed. [SEE SECOND RELEASE BELOW] . . .

http://banzhaf.net/   jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com   @profbanzhaf

Contact
GW Law
***@gmail.com


Source: Public Interest Law Professor John Banzhaf

Show All News | Report Violation

0 Comments

Latest on Rezul News