Popular on Rezul


Similar on Rezul

The Fells Firm Client Alleges 'Betrayal and Devastating Emotional Harm'

Rezul News/10725802
The client summarized the emotional and financial betrayal with a powerful metaphor: "It felt like I paid her to be a lifeline, and she took the money to use me as a raft—on to her next client, her next plea 'deal', her next 'no'."

SMYRNA, Ga. - Rezul -- A former client of The Fells Firm and attorney LaJuana Fells has come forward with explosive allegations, claiming their legal representation was marked by "indifference and cruelty," culminating in a deliberate strategy that manufactured a sense of defeat and violated the foundational trust of the attorney-client relationship. The client's account details a case where their voice was silenced, and their career was put at risk by what they describe as a "Settlement Mill" business model prioritizing quick turnover over client outcomes.

The client's document details a pattern of profound professional betrayal, including:
  • Flawed Legal Strategy: Attorney Fells is alleged to have filed motions, specifically for Pre-Trial Diversion (PTD) and a "Speaking Demurrer," that were "statutorily doomed to fail under Georgia law," as specified by O.C.G.A. § 15-18-80(e). The client felt these swift rejections were leveraged to create a "crushing feeling of hopelessness" about the case itself, making a career-ending settlement seem like the only option.
  • Erasure of Agency: The attorney allegedly breached the engagement agreement—which promised the client would have "the final say-so concerning all final decisions"—by unilaterally filing dispositive motions without the client's knowledge or consent. The client described this as a terrifying realization that their "advocate was behaving more like their captor."
  • Gaslighting and Mockery: In a devastating personal interaction, the attorney allegedly laughed at the client during a moment of desperation as they pleaded for her to genuinely fight for their case. When later confronted, the attorney offered a bureaucratic re-framing of the incident, which the client viewed as an act of gaslighting that invalidated their pain.
  • Abdication of Duty: The attorney stated in correspondence, "It is impossible for me to 'force' anyone to do anything." The client sees this as a "fundamental abdication of a litigator's duty," arguing that competent attorneys use motions and challenges to "force" the state's hand every day.
  • https://youtu.be/H6faYOwlMUs
The ordeal concluded when the client terminated Fells's representation. The client noted that the most telling moment was the "relief" they felt upon firing the firm, stating they instantly felt "emotionally safer and more in control" than they had been in months. "-----About The Fells Firm


https://www.thefellsfirm.com/

More on Rezul News
Source: The Atlanta Health Review
Filed Under: Consumer

Show All News | Report Violation

0 Comments

Latest on Rezul News