Possible Split Decision in Birthright Case - Expert

WASHINGTON - Rezul -- While the media and some constitutional scholars have suggested that the U.S. Supreme Court might issue a narrow ruling in the birthright citizenship case [No. 25-36,Trump v. Barbara] which will be argued on Wednesday morning:
The Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Options (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/03...)
one additional possibility which has been overlooked - although suggested by a law professor with an impressive number of wins in constitutional cases - is a split decision which gives something to each side in the proceeding.

Public interest law professor John Banzhaf has published a lengthy legal analysis (http://prsync.com/george-washington-university/...) suggesting that a child born in the U.S. to an alien would be entitled to birthright citizenship only if the mother was in the country legally at the time of birth; e.g., on a student, work, tourist, or visa-waiver visa.

More on Rezul News

• Rhealize Strategic Talent Advisory Co-Founder Dona Baker to Speak at DisruptHR YEG 15.0 in Edmonton on Hiring Innovation
• Instant IP Teams: Bringing Enterprise-Grade Collaboration to IP Protection at the Speed of Thought
• Summit Acquisitions Group Inc. Expands Cash Home Buying Services in Sacramento & East Bay
• UK Financial Ltd Confirms CATEX Exchange Integration of SMPRA and LTNS 1 Ahead of Compliance-Based Trading Activation
• Cash Home Buyer Solutions Home Buyers Helps Virginia Beach Homeowners Skip the Hassle

On the other hand, women who snuck across the border illegally - and especially if they remained in hiding "off the grid" - would not realistically be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" [of the U.S.], and therefore their children would not automatically acquire birthright citizenship.

Banzhaf points out that the Supreme Court decision most relied upon to establish birthright citizenship - United States v. Wong Kim Ark - applied only that a child born in the U.S. to Chinese immigrants legally residing and lawfully doing business in the U.S.   Therefore it has no relevance to a woman in the U.S. illegally and hiding from authorities.

Supporters of birthright citizenship also cite language from Plyler v. Doe but it's inapplicable dicta since the decision was based upon the Equal Protection Clause (with applies to all persons regardless of citizenship) and to an entitlement to public education, not citizenship.

Banzhaf also notes language from other Supreme Court decisions which undercut arguments that birthright citizen attaches to all births, and not only when the mother is legally present in the U.S. and therefore unquestionably "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

More on Rezul News

• Solutions Home Buyers Celebrates 23 Years of Cash Home Buying in Norfolk
• Ashikaga Flower Park's "Great Wisteria Festival 2026"
• Washington County PA Real Estate is Changing Here's What Homeowners Need to Know Before Selling
• Marc Longwith to be Featured in Real Estate Entrepreneurs In The Spotlight Magazine
• Architect of Neurodiversity Will Lead the First U.S. Team of Autistic Children to the "Genius Cup" in Hiroshima, Japan, in 2027

The law professor's detailed legal analysis can be found at:
A Possible Compromise in the Birthright Citizenship Case (http://prsync.com/george-washington-university/a-possible-compromise-in-the-birthright-citizenship-case----children-become-citizens-only-if-mother-was-in-the-us-lawfully-5180031/)
Children Become Citizens Only If Mother Was in the U.S. Lawfully (http://prsync.com/george-washington-university/...)

JOHN F. BANZHAF III, B.S.E.E., J.D., Sc.D.
Professor of Public Interest Law
George Washington University Law School
"The Man Behind The Ban on Cigarette Commercials"
FAMRI Dr. William Cahan Distinguished Professor,
Fellow, World Technology Network,
Creator of the "Banzhaf Index"
Founder, Action on Smoking and Health (ASH),
(703) 527-8418
http://banzhaf.net/   jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com   @profbanzhaf